CHICOS Maximum Likelihood Code

CTShower Code (May not be most recent.)
Shower Test Page (V. 3.03 Testing may not be most current. Be wary of using v. 3.02 as you may have to kill it manually.)
Write-up Updated.

Does ignoring unhit sites change the likelihood?

Test 1 - Normal reconstruction, v3.03
Test 2 - Dummy with above results
Test 3 - Same with unhit sites ignored
Test 4 - Dummy with higher energy
Test 5 - Same with unhit sites ignored
Test 6 - Reconstruction with unhit sites ignored

Notes:
- Taking away unhit sites improves the likelihood at a given energy.
- Given the same set of sites, the likelihood is worse at higher energies even though the LDF fit appears better (and chisquare is better)
=> Something else is causing the likelihood to behave oddly.

Comparing the dummy reconstruction using 2.42 with 3.03: the "fit" time is different between these versions. Everything else is the same, because the data is being pulled from the "fitshower" object (Brant's) not "fitshower_Shawn". However, the fit values are calculated in ShowerFitFunction, and in Shawn's version, Takeda's time function is replaced with the Mode of the TDF. This appears to move the times systematically earlier.

Test V. 242
Test V. 303