CHICOS Maximum Likelihood Code
CTShower Code (May not be most recent.)
Shower Test Page
(V. 3.03 Testing may not be most current. Be wary of using v. 3.02 as you may have to kill it
manually.)
Write-up Updated.
I want to compare the shower results from the normal code
(shmoo-by-shmoo) with the site-by-site code for showers which
differed. These are:
Shower 09-10-06 (shmoo-by-shmoo) vs. Shower 09-10-06 (site-by-site).
- Site-by-site looks better.
- Best reconstruction used 3.00 as a starting point for 2.35.
- Shower data not unusual.
- Two hits at one shmoo (130B).
Shower 03-21-06 (shmoo-by-shmoo) vs. Shower 03-21-06 (site-by-site).
- Site-by-site looks better.
- Best reconstruction used 3.00 as a starting point for 2.35.
- Shower data not unusual.
Shower 02-14-06 (shmoo-by-shmoo) vs. Shower 02-14-06 (site-by-site).
- Site-by-site looks better.
- Shower reconstructs well in v. 2.35.
- Shower data not unusual.
- Widely separated intensity of trigger hits.
- Multiple hits at one shmoo (152A).
Shower 02-04-06 (shmoo-by-shmoo) vs. Shower 02-04-06 (site-by-site).
- Site-by-site looks better.
- Best reconstruction uses SOTC 1000 with v 2.35.
- Shower data not unusual.
- Widely separated intensity of trigger hits.
